[time-nuts] radioactive decay rates change?
magnus at rubidium.dyndns.org
Tue Aug 24 07:08:29 UTC 2010
On 08/24/2010 08:56 AM, WB6BNQ wrote:
> That is absolutely not true ! Those CS-133's work very hard radiating from F1 to
> F2 and back again at 9+ GHz !
Very small hams?
PHK naturally meant radioactive decay...
> Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>> In message<4C72F32A.9000005 at elfpen.com>, Chris Howard writes:
>>> Any implication for CS clocks?
>> No. Cs133 is not radioactive.
>> Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
>> phk at FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
>> FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
>> Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>> and follow the instructions there.
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
More information about the time-nuts