[time-nuts] A philosophy of science view on the tight pll

WarrenS warrensjmail-one at yahoo.com
Thu Jun 3 14:11:30 UTC 2010

Steve said

>I fully agree that this test was only done for one input source and it 
>should be done for as many different types

Not true, it was done it many many different ways and units and levels and 
etc etc.
I think John spend the better part of a month finding things to test, Bless 
his great effort.
I think he was wanting to find something wrong with it, but that is another 
To say he did not consider every noise source he could get his hands on does 
not give if due credit.
He even made up several new ones,  some on purpose and some not so on 

and the results where always the same.  The tested worked as expected.



More information about the time-nuts mailing list