[time-nuts] A philosophy of science view on the tight pll
sar10538 at gmail.com
Thu Jun 3 16:32:57 UTC 2010
On 4 June 2010 02:11, WarrenS <warrensjmail-one at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Steve said
>> I fully agree that this test was only done for one input source and it
>> should be done for as many different types
> Not true, it was done it many many different ways and units and levels and
> etc etc.
> I think John spend the better part of a month finding things to test, Bless
> his great effort.
> I think he was wanting to find something wrong with it, but that is another
> To say he did not consider every noise source he could get his hands on does
> not give if due credit.
> He even made up several new ones, some on purpose and some not so on
I stand corrected!!!
Ah! but was it tested against a Shortt pendulum clock :)
> and the results where always the same. The tested worked as expected.
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> and follow the instructions there.
Steve Rooke - ZL3TUV & G8KVD
The only reason for time is so that everything doesn't happen at once.
More information about the time-nuts