[time-nuts] Thermal time constant
Predrag Dukic
stijena at tapko.de
Thu Mar 11 07:46:39 UTC 2010
How well depleted it really is? Uranium separation is not perfect.
Some radioactivity is still left.
I don't think it is healthy to have it beside You for a long time.
Certainly not 80000 pounds :))
At 05:35 11.3.2010, you wrote:
>Bob Camp wrote:
>>Hi
>>The gotcha is that you are interested in the amount of heat per
>>cubic foot rather than the amount of heat per pound. You need to
>>take the standard heat per weight numbers and convert them to heat
>>per volume numbers.
>>Of the things you can easily get, copper is good. Steel is not as
>>good as copper, but better than aluminum.
>>Bob
>
>Gold is your friend. Mercury has convective losses because it's a
>liquid. Platinum or Osmium would also be ok.
>
>You might want something that is dense but lower conductivity..
>lead? Depleted Uranium? (DU is available very cheaply if you can
>take 80,000 pound lots)
>
>_______________________________________________
>time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
>To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>and follow the instructions there.
>
>__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
>signature database 4933 (20100310) __________
>
>The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
>http://www.eset.com
>
>
More information about the time-nuts
mailing list