[time-nuts] Thermal time constant
Don Latham
djl at montana.com
Thu Mar 11 06:57:18 UTC 2010
water is pretty good, too and cheap. Coupling to it is easy as well.
Don
----- Original Message -----
From: "jimlux" <jimlux at earthlink.net>
To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement"
<time-nuts at febo.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 9:35 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Thermal time constant
> Bob Camp wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> The gotcha is that you are interested in the amount of heat per cubic
>> foot rather than the amount of heat per pound. You need to take the
>> standard heat per weight numbers and convert them to heat per volume
>> numbers. Of the things you can easily get, copper is good. Steel is not
>> as good as copper, but better than aluminum. Bob
>>
>
> Gold is your friend. Mercury has convective losses because it's a liquid.
> Platinum or Osmium would also be ok.
>
> You might want something that is dense but lower conductivity.. lead?
> Depleted Uranium? (DU is available very cheaply if you can take 80,000
> pound lots)
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
More information about the time-nuts
mailing list