[time-nuts] WWVB 60 kHz Loop Antenna Progress
lists at rtty.us
Tue Oct 19 21:59:02 UTC 2010
Also consider that there is a maximum practical Q for a rod antenna. Past a certain point the Q goes up because the flux is better contained. For an antenna to work, the flux can't be fully contained. Simply put, a toroid or pot core will make a very high Q inductor. Both make really lousy antennas.
On Oct 19, 2010, at 5:54 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <4CBDE533.9080101 at att.net>, Brooke Clarke writes:
>> I've been winding a number of loops for WWVB and have one that looks
>> good on test equipment.
> You should do a test where you warm the rod+windings in your hand,
> I found the center frequency would drift significantly with even
> minor temperature changes.
> It would of course not be unreasonable to temperature compensate a
> ferrite rod antenna, but I have been wondering if it would be
> possible to build a SDR receiver for 60kHz (or 77.5kHz) where the
> CPU autotunes the high-Q antenna based on the detected signal, but
> have not gotten the necessary round tuit.
> Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
> phk at FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
> FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
> Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
More information about the time-nuts