[time-nuts] [Fwd: Re: Simulating LORAN-A GRI Timing Generator]
magnus at rubidium.dyndns.org
Sat Jan 8 15:35:45 UTC 2011
On 08/01/11 16:08, J. Forster wrote:
> Pondering some more on this, doing some calculations (spread-sheets) the
> actual scheme emerge... the range of 0 to 7 is not selected by accident.
I had essentially the same spread sheet...
However, how would you be able to achieve simplicity of design by being
true to the PRI/PRR given or to what seems like reasonable counter based
solution. Notice that the ARN-4 has a "Crystal phasing" control to
adjust the crystal frequency of the receiver so that the receiver will
align up to the actual rate of the master station.
I think the PRI/PRR given is a presentation simplification rather than
true numbers. Considering that absolute frequency was not a requirement,
the repetition rate of the master needs to be sufficiently stable for
distinction of station and the receiver to make stable reading, in
presence of other stations.
That LORAN-C uses GRI indications with repetition rate in microseconds,
and fairly even such numbers as well, is another hint.
Thus, I view the PRI/PRR ratios as approximations at best, a matter of
presentation rather than actual nominal rates.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 12288 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the time-nuts