[time-nuts] Rigol scopes

David davidwhess at gmail.com
Wed Apr 18 23:11:29 UTC 2012


On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 13:56:18 +0000, shalimr9 at gmail.com wrote:

>That's why the default mode for a DSO should always be "pulse detect" or whatever the manufacturer calls it, unless you know what you are doing. As far as I know, all DSOs have this or an equivalent mode where the ADC runs at full speed regardless of sweep speed, and the min and max readings between two display points are stored. If you are in a condition that would otherwise result in aliasing, the trace will look like a big fat trace, just like on an analog scope if you are probing a 10MHz signal at 1mS/div.

Do the low end Rigol oscilloscopes actually support peak detection?
The manual only describes an envelope mode without any ability to set
the number of envelopes like a Tektronix 2440 can for single shot peak
detection.  When I was in the market for a DSO a couple years ago, the
Rigol representatives could not answer.  I ended up rebuilding an old
Tektronix 2230.

>You get the same issue with an analog sampling scope, except that those don't have a "pulse detect" mode, so they WILL lie to you unless you know what you are doing. It is not a "digital storage" issue, it is a sampling issue.

Sampling oscilloscopes are in a class all to their own and very
specialized.  Their low sample rates hinder capturing infrequent
events but if a repetitive glitch is there, they can still see it.  A
non-sampling oscilloscope with limited bandwidth could just as easily
miss a narrow pulse because of bandwidth constraints no matter how
high its sampling rate.



More information about the time-nuts mailing list