[time-nuts] Rigol scopes

shalimr9 at gmail.com shalimr9 at gmail.com
Thu Apr 19 21:54:16 UTC 2012


"A non-sampling oscilloscope with limited bandwidth could just as easily
miss a narrow pulse because of bandwidth constraints no matter how
high its sampling rate."

That is the point of the thread. Even a wide bandwidth analog scope used to show a 500nS pulse at a 200Hz repetition rate will have a hard time, while any DSO worth the name will have no problem with it.

Didier KO4BB

Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless thingy while I do other things...

-----Original Message-----
From: David <davidwhess at gmail.com>
Sender: time-nuts-bounces at febo.com
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 18:11:29 
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement<time-nuts at febo.com>
Reply-To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
	<time-nuts at febo.com>
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Rigol scopes

On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 13:56:18 +0000, shalimr9 at gmail.com wrote:

>That's why the default mode for a DSO should always be "pulse detect" or whatever the manufacturer calls it, unless you know what you are doing. As far as I know, all DSOs have this or an equivalent mode where the ADC runs at full speed regardless of sweep speed, and the min and max readings between two display points are stored. If you are in a condition that would otherwise result in aliasing, the trace will look like a big fat trace, just like on an analog scope if you are probing a 10MHz signal at 1mS/div.

Do the low end Rigol oscilloscopes actually support peak detection?
The manual only describes an envelope mode without any ability to set
the number of envelopes like a Tektronix 2440 can for single shot peak
detection.  When I was in the market for a DSO a couple years ago, the
Rigol representatives could not answer.  I ended up rebuilding an old
Tektronix 2230.

>You get the same issue with an analog sampling scope, except that those don't have a "pulse detect" mode, so they WILL lie to you unless you know what you are doing. It is not a "digital storage" issue, it is a sampling issue.

Sampling oscilloscopes are in a class all to their own and very
specialized.  Their low sample rates hinder capturing infrequent
events but if a repetitive glitch is there, they can still see it.  A
non-sampling oscilloscope with limited bandwidth could just as easily
miss a narrow pulse because of bandwidth constraints no matter how
high its sampling rate.

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


More information about the time-nuts mailing list