[time-nuts] GPSDO Alternatives
jimlux at earthlink.net
Fri Dec 7 15:07:20 UTC 2012
On 12/6/12 11:12 PM, Hal Murray wrote:
> Suppose you just implement a simple bang-bang control.
> Suppose the EFC is 1 volt and the frequency is correct but the GPSDO
> phase is a bit early relative to the GPS PPS. So the FF says early
> and the software says go-faster. That keeps happening for a while,
> the frequency keeps getting faster and faster. Finally, the GPSDO
> PPS catches up with the GPS PPS, but now it's frequency is way fast.
> The FF says go slower, so the control software starts dropping the
> EFC. But the frequency is still way too high so the error is still
> increasing. After a while the frequency gets low enough so the
> PPS/phase error starts catching up. Eventually the PPS error crosses
> over, but by then the frequency offset is way way low. ... Isn't
> that cyclic pattern stable?
> Is there a simple tweak to break that loop? Do you first have to
> recognize that you are in that mode? If so, how? ...
yes.. what you've described is essentially a first order control loop.
You can add higher order terms (e.g. integral or derivative) so that you
don't get overshoot.
> I might be able to do fix that in software by looking at the times
> when things change state. Suppose it's 193 seconds between the first
> early and the last early and that the EFC went from X to Y. I think
> that's enough info to work out the crossover point and work back to
> the desired EFC.
Yes.. that's another approach.. you figure out what the model is, and
> But that all sounds too complicated. What would hardware-only guys
> do with a 1 bit A/D?
More information about the time-nuts