[time-nuts] Fwd: FE-5680A Contact FEI

Fri Feb 17 18:26:42 UTC 2012

I believe in HPs case a unique situation occurred on the old gear.
That is there were and are people at agilent willing to take the time to
preserve their history. After all its still pretty fantastic stuff even at
20, 30, and yes I have a piece in the 40-50 years old era. Generally
amazingly well built. I do know that when test and measurement was HP their
support was top notch both for me professionally and personally. It did
effect what I chose to buy for the business. But on the personal side they
always helped I was above board about why I was calling.
Ahhh for the good ole days.
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL

On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Bob Camp <lists at rtty.us> wrote:

> Hi
>
> The closest the communications business got to this was back in the days
> when Motorola would buy back all the used gear. They then carted it all off
> to a crusher. Without something like that - it all will go to the scrap
> merchants and be parted out.
> Bob
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: time-nuts-bounces at febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces at febo.com] On
> Behalf Of Peter Gottlieb
> Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 10:25 AM
> To: time-nuts at febo.com
> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Fwd: FE-5680A Contact FEI
>
>  I am not so sure they have a lot of influence on what happens to equipment
> once they sell it to an OEM (e.g., Motorola).  The OEM then incorporates it
> into other equipment (cell systems) which are sold to cell service
> providers, which is then scrapped out and sold to scrap dealers.
> Realistically, I can't see one component supplier having the influence to
> cause the addition of costs all the way down the line to have to comply
> with
> this kind of demand, especially when the end user (the cell service
> providers) are in other countries such as China.  And to impose this demand
> retroactively to sales?  Fat chance; the cell service providers would just
> tell FEI they are welcome to bid on their scrap like everyone else.
>
> Peter
>
>
> On 02/17/12, paul swed<paulswedb at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The used market makes no difference to them. No revenue stream.
> In fact I would say you are swatting at the behive. It would be wise to
> leave them alone since several have reached out and already had a poor
> experience.
> As someone else pointed out this is what gets manufactures to demand
> crushing or drilling holes etc. Further the very hard work being done by
> this group to understand these units can be at risk if FEI decides to
> really get cranky.
> Regards
> Paul
> WB8TSL
>
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 3:57 AM, Steve <iteration69 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > If the device is reverse engineered and the work made public domain,
> > the device is likely to increase in value on the used market. I've seen
> > this before when proprietary products are reversed.
> > Suddenly they are transformed from black magic, in to something that a
> > community of people may thoroughly discuss, modify, repair, and
> > maintain. This makes a hot, usable device, for years to come.
> >
> > The last big reversing project I worked on dealt in the automotive
> > sector, I made my work available in a rar'd collection of abstract html
> > pages and documents within a directory that was easy to save and pass
> > on. I also encouraged everyone who looked at the document to download it
> > and pass it along. The system operators of the servers where the files
> > were originally located were told to remove the documents due to vague
> > claims of IP violations. The internet archive also removed my work as it
> > was cited for the same IP violoations. So in addition to increasing the
> > value of the device, reverse engineering also brings the very reversing
> > documentation under fire.
> >
> > usenet is a good place to distribute such a document, and it's also a
> > good idea to use several names so that any counter efforts are forced
> > to find all the derivatives.
> >
> > Steve
> >
> >
> > > Or worse, they will start requiring their scrappers to use a drill
> > > press or punch to render the physics package unusable. I've seen this
> > > done locally by hard drive manufacturers- hundreds of pounds of
> > > working HDs destroyed on purpose on a regular basis. If they only
> > > scrap "killed" units, no one will want to reverse engineer them.
> > >
> > >
> > > -Dave
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Mike McCauley" <mikem at open.com.au>
> > > To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement"
> > > <time-nuts at febo.com> Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 11:02:28 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Fwd: FE-5680A Contact FEI
> > >
> > > Hmmm,
> > >
> > > Seems they dont realise that their lack of cooperation will lead, not
> > > to protecting their product, but rather to the massive, public
> > > reverse engineering of it?
> > >
> > >
> > > On Friday, February 17, 2012 05:43:49 PM Gerald Molenkamp wrote:
> > > > I have written to them on several occasions about 56
> > > >
> > > > Sent via Gerald's iPad
> > > >
> > > > Begin forwarded message:
> > > > > From: Peter Gottlieb <nerd at verizon.net>
> > > > > Date: 16 February 2012 10:58:10 AEDT
> > > > > To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
> > > > > <time-nuts at febo.com> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] FE-5680A Contact
> > > > > FEI Reply-To: nerd at verizon.net, Discussion of precise time and
> > > > > frequency measurement <time-nuts at febo.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > I haven't personally tried but others have reported they were
> > > > > somewhat less than cooperative.
> > > > >
> > > > > Peter
> > > > >
> > > > > On 2/15/2012 6:23 PM, Bill Riches wrote:
> > > > >> Just curious,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Has anyone on this list actually contacted FEI and enquired
> > > > >> about a schematic or other info about our 5680 units? They are
> > > > >> still being sold by them.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> 73,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Bill Riches, WA2DVU
> > > > >> Cape May, NJ
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> _______________________________________________
> > > > >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> > > > >> To unsubscribe, go to
> > > > >> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and
> > > > >> follow the instructions there.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> -----
> > > > >> No virus found in this message.
> > > > >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> > > > >> Version: 10.0.1424 / Virus Database: 2112/4811 - Release Date:
> > > > >> 02/15/12
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> > > > > To unsubscribe, go to
> > > > > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and
> > > > > follow the instructions there.
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> > > > To unsubscribe, go to
> > > > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow
> > > > the instructions there.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> > To unsubscribe, go to
> > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> > and follow the instructions there.
> >
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>