[time-nuts] Modern HW replacement for ATOM based NTP server?

Didier Juges shalimr9 at gmail.com
Tue Apr 7 12:41:52 EDT 2015

Is the new RPi2 any different in that regard?

On April 7, 2015 8:17:12 AM CDT, Daniel Mendes <dmendesf at gmail.com> wrote:
>Internally the rPI is a ver awkward beast: the CPU is connected to a 
>GPU, and the GPU is connected to the GPIOs... so lots of jitter and
>It was designed to be a video decoder... the CPU is there for testing 
>and housekeeping. It works, surelly, but it´s not designed to have low 
>latency and jitter.
>On 07/04/2015 09:39, Hal Murray wrote:
>> albertson.chris at gmail.com said:
>>> In terms of performance, ARM based credit card sized computers do
>well if
>>> you can get the PPS to the general purpose I/O pin that interrupts
>on an
>>> edge.  the Pi can't do that the BeagleBone Black can and it sell for
>> What/why can't the Pi do?  I have one handy that is processing a PPS
>on a
>> GPIO pin.
>> David Taylor has a web page with all the fine print on how to set it
>> (Thanks.)
>time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
>To unsubscribe, go to
>and follow the instructions there.

Sent from my Motorola Droid Razr HD 4G LTE wireless tracker while I do other things.

More information about the time-nuts mailing list