[time-nuts] FLL errors
kb8tq at n1k.org
Sat Aug 29 08:34:26 EDT 2015
There are many ways to implement just about anything. There are lots of features
that can be added into any design. Multi-lock loops are something that goes back at
least into the 1940’s.
> On Aug 28, 2015, at 6:37 PM, Azelio Boriani <azelio.boriani at gmail.com> wrote:
> If FLL: something that links frequencies,
> PLL: something that links phases,
> frequency detector: output proportional to frequency error,
> phase detector: output proportional to phase error (XOR),
> and the original question (about FLL) was how to implement a simple FLL,
> can an FLL be made by a phase detector?
No it can not with a real phase detector. The advantage of an FLL is that it can tolerate
a frequency error and still be locked. That’s it’s advantage. If you have a phase detector,
it will run into a limit and crash with a frequency error. If you have a system that needs
tolerate a long term frequency offset, that’s one of many reasons to use an FLL.
> Can a PLL be made by a
> frequency detector?
Again, not with a real world part. Any real detector will have a zero error. That error
will be fatal if you are trying to do phase with a frequency detector.
> Phase_detector_XOR + RC + VCO-> FLL: equal frequencies, phase linked
> to VCO odds,
> in this case the frequency error is 0.
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 7:14 PM, Charles Steinmetz
> <csteinmetz at yandex.com> wrote:
>> Azelio wrote:
>>> OK: the XOR gate with an RC is a defective PLL and a defective FLL. It
>>> is a simple way to have an idea of what an xLL should be but of no
>>> serious use.
>> No, not at all. I was suggesting that the XOR PLL you were commenting on
>> had problems.
>> First, an XOR with or without an RC is not an FLL at all, of any sort.
>> Second, the XOR gate is a time-honored phase detector for PLLs, and if its
>> limitations are understood and accounted for, it makes a perfectly
>> serviceable PD for a PLL. There are other phase detectors that are more
>> popular these days, for a variety of reasons, but the XOR works just fine in
>> a proper design.
>> See, e.g.:
>> Best, Phase-Locked Loops (2007), pp. 16-18
>> Gardner, Phaselock Techniques (3rd ed) (2005), pp. 245-46
>> Wolaver, Phase-Locked Loop Circuit Design (1991) pp. 55-59
>> and many, many, many others.
>> Best regards,
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to
>> and follow the instructions there.
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
More information about the time-nuts