[time-nuts] Q/noise of Earth as an oscillator
scott.j.stobbe at gmail.com
Sun Jul 31 20:51:02 EDT 2016
An irreversible process would be a better description versus energy loss.
Like joule heating (resistance, friction).
On Sunday, 31 July 2016, Hal Murray <hmurray at megapathdsl.net> wrote:
> > So loss effects frequency in one situation and amplitude in the other.
> > can Q relate to both situations?
> It's energy loss in both cases.
> Is there a term other than Q that is used to describe the rate of energy
> for things that aren't oscillators?
> These are my opinions. I hate spam.
> To unsubscribe, go to
> and follow the instructions there.
More information about the time-nuts