[time-nuts] Q/noise of Earth as an oscillator
kb8tq at n1k.org
Sun Jul 31 21:00:51 EDT 2016
> On Jul 31, 2016, at 8:19 PM, Hal Murray <hmurray at megapathdsl.net> wrote:
> time at radio.sent.com said:
>> So loss effects frequency in one situation and amplitude in the other. How
>> can Q relate to both situations?
> It's energy loss in both cases.
> Is there a term other than Q that is used to describe the rate of energy loss
> for things that aren't oscillators?
ummm…. Q is the general term of rate of energy loss and we just happen to apply
it to oscillators in a very elegant fashion….
> These are my opinions. I hate spam.
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
More information about the time-nuts