[time-nuts] ADC sample voting algorithm?
kb8tq at n1k.org
Wed Oct 5 20:00:15 EDT 2016
What does the signal you are sampling look like?
Does it (maybe) have a bit of noise on it?
If it is the output of a “normal” TDC, then the answer is to sample once.
> On Oct 5, 2016, at 7:45 PM, Nick Sayer via time-nuts <time-nuts at febo.com> wrote:
> This is tangentially on topic, I suppose. It’s for my GPSDO.
> I notice periodically that the phase measurements seem “noisy.” You can see that over the course of several seconds the value doesn’t change, then it jumps a bunch and then comes right back.
> My theory at the moment is that sampling the ADC multiple times in a row might help, but then what’s the best way to (quickly) pick which sample to use?
> The mean would allow a bad sample undue influence.
> At the moment, I’ve coded taking 3 samples, averaging them and picking the sample that is closest to the mean. If I’m right, and two of the samples happen to be very close to each other and a third is an outlier, then that seems like it would eliminate it.
> I guess what I want is the mode, but with 3 samples, that’s going to be poorly defined (if at all).
> Anyone have any suggestions (besides a larger sample size)?
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
More information about the time-nuts