[volt-nuts] What's All This Low Thermal EMF Test Lead Stuff?

Laurence Motteram LMotteram at scientific-devices.com.au
Tue Aug 19 21:25:02 EDT 2014


Keithley offer a Low Level Measurements Handbook that may be of interest.  Go to www.keithley.com, Knowledge Centre.  The digital book is a free download (requires registration).  You may be able to get a paperback copy from your local Keithley rep just for the asking.

Regards,

Laurence Motteram

-----Original Message-----
From: volt-nuts-bounces at febo.com [mailto:volt-nuts-bounces at febo.com] On Behalf Of Stan Katz
Sent: Wednesday, 20 August 2014 9:35 AM
To: Discussion of precise voltage measurement
Subject: Re: [volt-nuts] What's All This Low Thermal EMF Test Lead Stuff?

You are on the money that guarding/shielding are sadly neglected as subjects, in their own right. Posts in this group consist primarily of reports of guard leakage in member instruments, and repair details.
Discussion of proper lash ups of cal. instruments to home built devices, or even work prototypes, would be very welcome by me. I have read Analog Devices AN-347, but a tutorial with problems that the student must complete the lash ups for, would give me a better idea if I've grasped the subject matter. There are two text books mentioned at the end of AN-347, one by Morrison, the other by Ott. Any suggestion as to which to buy? The latest texts by these authors are pricey, so that's why I'd like to pick just one.


On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 3:37 AM, <acbern at gmx.de> wrote:

> generally I think, and at least for your gear, if you use copper plugs 
> of some type and even solder the wires, thats perfectly fine.
> also for a 3458a, and after proper temp stabilization after connecting 
> the cables (5min) which you always need, these are fine, have not 
> measrured any difference to crimped cables. also the type of cable 
> plating (tin/silver..) does not make much difference.
> there were many discussions over time, but all the cadmium solder and 
> non plated copper type debates are not making much sense down to the 
> 3458a level.
> I have not done comparison tests with nanovolt meters, as mine have 
> fixed cables, so no option to change them without destroying them, but 
> note that e.g. the 182 nanovolt meter has a mil type plug (no special contacts).
> sources of error are also things like where to connect the guard to, 
> these often make a much bigger difference (I have seen these many 
> times, causing voltage differences of several uV depending where in 
> the setup you connected the guard, while otherwise the measurement was 
> perfectly stable), and I bet while people put a lot of effort into the 
> emf discussion, the guard issue is more often causing errors in 
> measurements in real life. and thats just one example of additional causes of errors.
> cheers
>
> > Gesendet: Dienstag, 19. August 2014 um 06:07 Uhr
> > Von: "Stan Katz" <stan.katz.hk at gmail.com>
> > An: "Discussion of precise voltage measurement" <volt-nuts at febo.com>
> > Betreff: [volt-nuts] What's All This Low Thermal EMF Test Lead Stuff?
> >
> > I'm a self described volt-nut-near-beer. I don't own a 732A/B, or an 
> > HP3458. I do own HP3456 DMMs that are at the top of my 
> > instrumentation pecking order.  I have all the necessary gear to 
> > calibrate these DMMs according to ancient HP documentation. At the 
> > top of my cal. chain is the 731B, called out in HP3456 original 
> > documentation.  This hierarchy places me in the near-beer, or junior 
> > member status of the group. I look forward to being educated, and/or 
> > corrected on my understanding of the use of
> test
> > leads with precision instrumentation.
> >
> >  I don't find much ancient HP documentation on test leads. The only 
> > recommendations in the era of the 3456 back to the 1960's is to use 
> > as thick a solid lead of pure copper wire as you can find, and 
> > insert the
> wire
> > into the drill hole on the banana terminal. If the copper is pure, 
> > and
> has
> > been properly cleaned, the thermal emf's on both identical length 
> > leads should all be balanced, and cancel out. In any case, pure 
> > copper-copper connections generate the lowest thermal emf. I  will 
> > agree that
> manhandling
> > 16 gauge solid wire can be very inconvenient.
> >
> >  The path I have taken recently is to order Nakamichi gold over 
> > copper stereo banana plugs for my connections ( I deal in low 
> > voltage work exclusively), as well as gold plated spade lugs to go 
> > under the banana screw-downs. ( My budget ruled out gold over 
> > beryllium copper Pomona
> brand
> > spades. )  I will then experiment between the two connector types. 
> > As for connections, it seems to me the best course is just to screw 
> > down the banana plugs, or in the case of the spades, just crimp. 
> > I'll wing it on
> the
> > crimping, and see if simple tools can perform adequately. I would 
> > avoid solder, since how can one form identical topological spots of 
> > solder on every connection, deposited at the exact same place on 
> > each connection,
> and
> > ensure the exact same weight of solder, to the microgram, on each 
> > connection. Since my modus operandi is to aim for balanced emfs, I 
> > think solder is out. Of course, if one wishes to risk one's health, 
> > and that of the family, one can track down a source of cadmium, and 
> > mix up a lot of
> low
> > thermal emf solder (cadmium solder is banned in the US, and 
> > EU)...not for me.
> >
> > Don't worry, I won't be using tin plated wire, I managed to pick up 
> > a
> spool
> > of silver plated 16 gauge wire for my investigations.  Am I on some 
> > other planet for choosing the balanced thermal emf approach for 
> > precision test lead applications, as opposed to going to great 
> > lengths to eliminate
> every
> > trace of emf?
> >
> > Please forgive me if these emf discussions have been between 
> > engineers working outdoors in the oil fields of North Dakota, or out 
> > on a North Sea drilling platform. In that case, go for all the super 
> > low emf techniques you can lay your hands on.
> >
> > Good Luck,
> > Stan
> > _______________________________________________
> > volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts at febo.com To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
> > and follow the instructions there.
> >
> _______________________________________________
> volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts at febo.com To unsubscribe, go to 
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
_______________________________________________
volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts at febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
--
Message  protected by MailGuard: e-mail anti-virus, anti-spam and content filtering.
http://www.mailguard.com.au




More information about the volt-nuts mailing list